首页> 外文OA文献 >Clear Zone - A synthesis of practice and an evaluation of the benefits of meeting the ten-foot clear zone goal on urban streets
【2h】

Clear Zone - A synthesis of practice and an evaluation of the benefits of meeting the ten-foot clear zone goal on urban streets

机译:净空区-综合实践并评估在城市街道上达到10英尺净空区目标的好处

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In urban communities, there are often limited amounts of right-of-way available for establishinga large setback distance from the curb for fixed objects. Urban communities must constantlyweigh the cost of purchasing additional right-of-way for clear zones against the risk of fixedobject crashes. From 2004 to 2006, this type of crash on curbed roads represented 15% of allfatal crashes and 3% of all crashes in the state of Iowa. Many states have kept the currentminimum AASHTO recommendations as their minimum clear zone standards; however, otherstates have decided that these recommendations are insufficient and have increased the requiredminimum clear zone distance to better suit the judgment of local designers.This thesis presents research on the effects of the clear zone on urban curbed streets. Theresearch was conducted in two phases. The first phase involved a synthesis of practice thatincluded a literature review and a survey of practices in jurisdictions that have developmentaland historical patterns similar to those of Iowa. The second phase involved investigating thebenefits of a 10 ft clear zone, which included examining urban corridors in Iowa that meet or donot meet the 10 ft clear zone goal. The results of this study indicate that a consistent fixed objectoffset results in a reduction in the number of fixed object crashes, a 5 ft clear zone is mosteffective when the goal is to minimize the number of fixed object crashes, and a 3 ft clear zone ismost effective when the goal is to minimize the cost of fixed object crashes.
机译:在城市社区中,通行权的数量通常有限,无法为固定物体从路缘建立较大的后退距离。城市社区必须不断权衡购买额外的通行权以获取净空区域的成本,以免发生固定物体碰撞的风险。从2004年到2006年,在爱荷华州,这种道路上的事故占全部致命事故的15%,占所有事故的3%。许多州将AASHTO的最低建议作为其最低净区标准。然而,其他州认为这些建议是不充分的,并增加了所需的最小净空地距离,以更好地适合当地设计师的判断。本文提出了对净空地对城市路障影响的研究。研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段涉及实践的综合,包括文献回顾和对具有与爱荷华州相似的发展历史模式的辖区中的实践的调查。第二阶段涉及调查10英尺净空区的好处,其中包括检查衣阿华州达到或不达到10英尺净空区目标的城市走廊。这项研究的结果表明,一致的固定物体偏移量会减少固定物体碰撞的次数,当目标是最大程度地减少固定物体碰撞次数时,最有效的5英尺净空区,最接近3英尺净空区是最有效的。当目标是最大程度地减少固定对象崩溃的成本时,此选项有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sax, Christian Ryan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号